2ms vs 4ms and 16bit vs 32 bit seismic for interpretation
Are there any advantages in:
a) loading a 32bit seismic data volume vs a 16 or 8 bit volume for interpretation in paradigm, petrel, etc....
b) Using seismic data sampled at 2ms vs 4ms..
I would imagine that the resolution in both cases would be better, useful especially for seismic attribute maps and for detailed well ties with lithology in depth cross sections.
As the larger seismic volumes would require greater computer resources, I would appreciate a clarification or exchange from similar experiences