Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share knowledge. Become a member now for instant access to the Petroleum Geology Forums

  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology Students can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.
   



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Large‐scale 3D inversion of potential field data 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 207
Post Large‐scale 3D inversion of potential field data
Geophysical Prospecting: Large‐scale 3D inversion of potential field data

Inversion of gravity and/or magnetic data attempts to recover the density and/or magnetic susceptibility distribution in a 3D earth model for subsequent geological interpretation. This is a challenging problem for a number of reasons. First, airborne gravity and magnetic surveys are characterized by very large data volumes. Second, the 3D modelling of data from large‐scale surveys is a computationally challenging problem. Third, gravity and magnetic data are finite and noisy and their inversion is ill posed so regularization must be introduced for the recovery of the most geologically plausible solutions from an infinite number of mathematically equivalent solutions. These difficulties and how they can be addressed in terms of large‐scale 3D potential field inversion are discussed in this paper. Since potential fields are linear, they lend themselves to full parallelization with near‐linear scaling on modern parallel computers. Moreover, we exploit the fact that an instrument’s sensitivity (or footprint) is considerably smaller than the survey area. As multiple footprints superimpose themselves over the same 3D earth model, the sensitivity matrix for the entire earth model is constructed. We use the re‐weighted regularized conjugate gradient method for minimizing the objective functional and incorporate a wide variety of regularization options. We demonstrate our approach with the 3D inversion of 1743 line km of FALCON gravity gradiometry and magnetic data acquired over the Timmins district in Ontario, Canada. Our results are shown to be in good agreement with independent interpretations of the same data.

Go to Article


Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:42 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 




Who is online at the Petroleum Geology Forums

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO