Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share valuable knowledge. Registration is easy so become a member now for instant free access.
  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Upstream Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology students and graduates can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.

  >> Register Now





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Minimum Grid Cell Volumetrics with Pinch-outs 
Author Message

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:11 pm
Posts: 12
Post Minimum Grid Cell Volumetrics with Pinch-outs
Hi!

I was wandering if anybody had ideas on how to use the minimum vertical cell size in Petrel?
When I create my model I usually find that there will still cells smaller than the minimum I specified.

Also, is there a way to delete or reset the cells that pinch out? I have had quite a lot of problems with finding and deleting pinch-outs based on a minimum volume of the cell or its height. This does partly do the trick but this is not very clean and the cell is still active. I would prefer to take each pinch out (or group them if they are stacked on top of each other) and then either remove them all, or combine them into a single cubic cell (which I would prefer). Combining them into a single cubic cell would change the models volume but with the amount of uncertainty already in the surface this should not be of any concern.

Any suggestions are welcome!

thanks,

James


Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:20 pm

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:45 am
Posts: 30
Post Re: Minimum Grid Cell Volumetrics with Pinch-outs
James,

Given the general geometry of reservoir models will you not always remain having cells pinching out. That is: cells that have a certain vertical polygon much shorter that others. Is this not only a scaling issue? If it is for simulation purposes I would go for deleting them.

Or... am I missing the point here?

let me know!

Willem


Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:27 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 


Related topics 
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Petrel 3D grid

ngroy

1

1905

Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:23 pm

Petrel_user View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Merging 3 D grid

ngroy

1

1651

Tue Mar 04, 2014 6:48 pm

Petrel_user View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. regular grid and strtural surface

ngroy

1

1574

Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:16 pm

Petrel_user View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Analysis of grid atributes like in Geo-bodies

EPman

2

1198

Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:02 am

EPman View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Importing Several Eclipse Data on same Grid in Petrel 2010.2

seawhisperer

2

2907

Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:03 am

seawhisperer View the latest post

 



Search for:
Jump to:  


Content on EPGeology.com is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, professional judgment. EPGeology.com disclaims any and all liability for your use of its content. As most of our content is supplied by our users we can not check copyright, and stress that copyright remains at the original owner. If you suspect copyright infringement please use the contact form to report it.
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB Asteroid Mining

phpBB SEO