Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share knowledge. Become a member now for instant access to the Petroleum Geology Forums

  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology Students can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.
   



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Experimental verification of the fracture density and... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 207
Post Experimental verification of the fracture density and...
Geophysical Prospecting: Experimental verification of the fracture density and shear‐wave splitting relationship using synthetic silica cemented sandstones with a controlled fracture geometry

We present laboratory ultrasonic measurements of shear‐wave splitting from two synthetic silica cemented sandstones. The manufacturing process, which enabled silica cementation of quartz sand grains, was found to produce realistic sandstones of average porosity 29.7 ± 0.5% and average permeability 29.4 ± 11.3 mD. One sample was made with a regular distribution of aligned, penny‐shaped voids to simulate meso‐scale fractures in reservoir rocks, while the other was left blank. Ultrasonic shear waves were measured with a propagation direction of 90° to the coincident bedding plane and fracture normal. In the water saturated blank sample, shear‐wave splitting, the percentage velocity difference between the fast and slow shear waves, of <0.5% was measured due to the bedding planes (or layering) introduced during sample preparation. In the fractured sample, shear‐wave splitting (corrected for layering anisotropy) of 2.72 ± 0.58% for water, 2.80 ± 0.58% for air and 3.21 ± 0.58% for glycerin saturation at a net pressure of 40 MPa was measured. Analysis of X‐ray CT scan images was used to determine a fracture density of 0.0298 ± 0.077 in the fractured sample. This supports theoretical predictions that shear‐wave splitting (SWS) can be used as a good estimate for fracture density in porous rocks (i.e., SWS = 100εf, where εf is fracture density) regardless of pore fluid type, for wave propagation at 90° to the fracture normal.

Go to Article


Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:53 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 


Related topics 
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Experimental estimation of velocities and anisotropy...

ArticlePoster

0

21

Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:21 am

ArticlePoster View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Detection of multiple fracture sets using...

ArticlePoster

0

96

Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:43 am

ArticlePoster View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Field measurements of normal and shear fracture...

ArticlePoster

0

58

Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:23 am

ArticlePoster View the latest post

 


Who is online at the Petroleum Geology Forums

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO