Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share valuable knowledge. Registration is easy so become a member now for instant free access.
  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Upstream Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology students and graduates can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.

  >> Register Now





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
What is kriging and co-kriging? 
Author Message

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:20 pm
Posts: 2
Post What is kriging and co-kriging?
Hello,

I am a junior static modeler and am only just learning about reservoir characterization and property modeling. My colleagues often talk about kriging and co-kriging, but I do not understand what they are talking about. I know it has to do with property modeling in Petrel...

Can anybody please explain what kriging and co-kriging is?

Much appreciated!

Rashied


Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:36 pm

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 14
Post Re: What is kriging and co-kriging?
You can have a look here for an explanation: static-modeling-f39/kriging-and-the-nugget-t205.html

For a more scientific explanation see below:

Any unsampled value, a porosity for example, can be estimated by generalized regression from surrounding measurements of the same value once the statistical relationship between the unknown being estimated and the available sample values has been defined. This is exactly what the correlogram (or variogram) provides: a prior model of the statistical similarity between data values. This generalized regression can also include nearby measurements of some different variable, like seismic travel time, or a facies code. When using such secondary information, one also needs a prior model of the cross-correlogram, which provides information on the statistical similarity between different variables at different locations. Kriging only uses a correlogram while co-kriging takes a secondary variable into acount using the cross-correlogram.

They generalize traditional regression as applied in well log analysis in two senses:
    A) The data used (the “independent variables” in traditional statistical jargon) need not be independent one from another. This allows redundancy to be taken into account, an important factor when using several related well logs simultaneously.
    B) The sample correlation is modeled before being applied to the regression analysis. This allows for filtering certain aspects (frequencies) of the sample correlation. For example, white noise and more generally the high frequency components of the data can be filtered out, leaving an interpolated map that reflects only the large scale trends of these data’s. Conversely, a particular trend known from indirect information can be built into the map in such a way that it honors as closely as possible the available data.

However, multivariate regression, or “cokriging” as a geostatistician would call it, is usually not a convenient framework for the integration of too largely different types of data such as qualitative geological information, which is usually only indicative in nature, and direct laboratory measurements. At a particular location where one does not yet have a porosity measurement, a consideration of the litho-facies information might provide a reasonable interval within which the unknown value should fall. If we are certain that we are in a particular type of sandstone, we might know that the porosity must be somewhere in the interval from 15% to 25%. If, in addition, we also have enough core plug measurements within that particular sandstone to build a histogram, we could use that histogram to provide a probability distribution that might, for example, tell us that the unknown porosity is more likely to be on the low end of our 15% to 25%
range than on the high end.

The indicator framework of geostatistics and the soft kriging algorithm allow an updating of such prior distribution using nearby data that may be either “soft” or “hard”. To continue with our previous example, we could locally update the previous probability distribution obtained from lithofacies considerations with more specific local information. This could be soft information, such as the fact that the location in question is in the upper half of a fining-upwards sequence, or hard information, such as the fact that a full core measurement taken in a well only 50 feet away had a porosity of 19,6%. The result of this updating is a “posterior” probability distribution that provides the probability for the unsampled value to belong within any given class of values, say, between 15% and 20% porosity. From such a distribution, any “optimal” estimate for the unsampled value can be derived once an optimality criterion has been specified. The optimality criterion preferred by most statisticians is the least square error criterion; for this definition of optimality, the mean of the posterior probability distribution provides the best estimate. This is why in kriging outside any data control (defined by the range of the variogram) the local average (ordinary kriging) or the global average (simple kriging) is used.


Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:55 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 


Related topics 
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. kriging and the nugget?

Headburner

2

3325

Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:19 pm

DaveLove View the latest post

 



Search for:
Jump to:  


Content on EPGeology.com is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, professional judgment. EPGeology.com disclaims any and all liability for your use of its content. As most of our content is supplied by our users we can not check copyright, and stress that copyright remains at the original owner. If you suspect copyright infringement please use the contact form to report it.
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB Asteroid Mining

phpBB SEO