Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share knowledge. Become a member now for instant access to the Petroleum Geology Forums

  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology Students can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.
   



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Propablistic Method of Petrophysical Analysis 
Author Message

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:53 am
Posts: 9
Post Propablistic Method of Petrophysical Analysis
Dear All
Can every body Help us to contribute in Probabilistic Methods for Petrophysical Analysis just like Methodology in Elan in geoframe package or Mineral Solver in Interactive Petrophysics or Quanti-Min in Techlog Softwares.
I want to understand the Theoretical basic theory how to applicative this procedures.
Thanks alot .
wael


Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:06 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:15 pm
Posts: 30
Post Re: Propablistic Method of Petrophysical Analysis
Well, the way I perceive "Probabilistic analysis" is that petrophysicists set up or choose a certain mineral model that applies to the formation. They choose which log types should be calculated using the models. The computer algorithms than use this model to calculate the logs that are then compared to the original logs.

I'm not totally familiar with the methodology though..

Is this what you are referring to?


Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 1
Post Re: Propablistic Method of Petrophysical Analysis
In this method you are supposed to tell the software what minerals (rocks) and fluid phases are present in the zone of interest. You also need to define which are the logs that are the most representative to define the zone. According to this input software calculates the most probable distribution of minerals and fluids. It also quantifies error for every model it calculates.

You can control the outcome (diminish the error) by changing some of the parameters, usualy clay and clay minerals, or by choosing different log curves as input and giving them different weighing factor (trust). The model you are building needs to be determined in such way:
number of minerals+number of fluid phases<=number of input curves+1.

This method of interpretation is not totaly controlable like the deterministic approach but gives excellent results and needs to be used only when you have extensive knowledge about the reservoir lithology (lots of core data, local knowledge...)


Mon May 30, 2011 10:33 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 


Related topics 
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Petrophysical Software Room

geologist_wael

1

480

Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:39 am

Francisco View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Petrophysical properties define facies?

Jaury

2

447

Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:11 am

Jaury View the latest post

 


Who is online at the Petroleum Geology Forums

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO