Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share knowledge. Become a member now for instant access to the Petroleum Geology Forums

  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology Students can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.
   



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
IMPACT OF DIAGENESIS ON RESERVOIR QUALITY IN RAMP... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 207
Post IMPACT OF DIAGENESIS ON RESERVOIR QUALITY IN RAMP...
Journal of Petroleum Geology: IMPACT OF DIAGENESIS ON RESERVOIR QUALITY IN RAMP CARBONATES: GIALO FORMATION (MIDDLE EOCENE), SIRT BASIN, LIBYA

The reservoir quality of Middle Eocene carbonates in the intracratonic Sirt Basin is strongly influenced by depositional facies and various diagenetic processes. Based on data from core samples and well logs from five boreholes in the Assumood and Sahl gasfields in the subsurface of the north‐central Sirt Basin, six major carbonate facies (and fourteen microfacies) are distinguished in the Middle Eocene Gialo Formation (thickness ∼1100 ft/335 m). Wackestones‐packstones dominate the Gialo Formation with abundant grains of larger benthic foraminifera, especially nummulites, in a matrix composed mostly of finely comminuted bioclastic material. Sediments were deposited as a mosaic of facies on a broad carbonate ramp in moderate‐energy nummulite‐packstone banks, with locally restricted back‐bank lagoons and fore‐bank areas of foraminiferal debris passing to offshore lime mudstones.Marine diagenesis was minor with micritization of bioclasts and rare vadose marine fibrous cements. Sparry calcite cements are ubiquitous and were precipitated during shallow to moderate burial from seawater and/or meteoric water, the latter largely unaffected by surface‐pedogenic processes. This is indicated by the fabrics and pre‐ and post‐compaction precipitation of drusy spar and echinoderm overgrowths, and supported by their bright‐to‐dull luminescence and low negative δ18O signatures (‐2.68 to ‐4.16%° PDB). Some early neomorphic alteration of calcitic bioclasts is suggested by bright CL and marine to low negative δ18O values (‐1.06 to –3.93%° PDB). Bioclastic grains have δ13C values ranging between 0.76 and 1.19%° PDB, interpreted as marine signatures. Similar low positive δ13C values of the cements (0.9 to 1.05 %°) indicate a source of carbonate from dissolution of grains and/or seawater/meteoric water, but without any near‐surface/soil effects. Dissolution of grains and matrix, notably originally aragonitic grains but also the originally high‐Mg calcite nummulites, was a major porosity‐enhancing process, and took place from shallow to moderate burial depths. Fractures may locally have increased porosity too.Shallow‐water packstones/rudstones containing both primary intergranular and secondary biomouldic porosity have the best reservoir quality and these are concentrated in the upper parts (top ∼100 ft/30 m) of the wells, with porosity‐permeability decreasing downwards. This trend relates to the broad, large‐scale facies pattern of more mud‐dominated facies giving way upwards to more grainy, nummulite‐dominated facies as a result of an overall shallowing of the depositional environment. In addition, the influx of meteoric waters in the upper part of the Gialo platform, before drowning and deposition of the overlying Augila Shale, increased porosity through dissolution. This integrated study has helped in understanding the reservoir heterogeneity and hydrocarbon potential of the Gialo carbonates.

Go to Article


Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:16 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 


Related topics 
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. RESERVOIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PETROFACIES OF THE...

ArticlePoster

0

172

Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:28 am

ArticlePoster View the latest post

 


Who is online at the Petroleum Geology Forums

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO