Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share valuable knowledge. Registration is easy so become a member now for instant free access.
  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Upstream Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology students and graduates can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.

  >> Register Now





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
On the form of the space‐time domain reflection... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 14670
Post On the form of the space‐time domain reflection...
Geophysical Prospecting: On the form of the space‐time domain reflection function for a simple flat‐lying interface

A description is given of the function R(x, t) forming the kernel of the space‐time domain reflection operator for scalar waves illuminating a single interface in two space dimensions. This reflection function is closely related to migration common‐image gathers and it can be thought of as the set of all plane‐wave reflection coefficients after Fourier synthesis over wavenumber, or slowness, and frequency.R(x, t) is a generalized function with a complicated form at the origin, or around it when smoothing is applied. Much can be inferred from knowledge of the plane‐wave coefficients themselves and a simple scalar‐ or acoustic‐wave case without density variation displays the essential features. The theoretical predictions are visualized by smoothed numerical examples obtained using a discrete Fourier transform method. The space‐time form of the reflection function for a low‐contrast boundary is also considered, as is, briefly, the transmission function.Among the characteristics of R(x, t) are that it is essentially V shaped in the (x, t) plane, with linear arms given by the wave cones for the two media involved. These arms carry  signals, where H(t) is the Heaviside step function. The time dependence along x = 0 is also relatively simple, being like the delta derivative δ′(t). At or around the origin R(x, t) is intricate due to the fine balancing of its plane‐wave components. This intricacy makes the corresponding reflection operator capable of analysing an arbitrary incident wave to give the reflected wave, including such effects as total reflection and head waves and the reflection of short horizontal wavelength evanescent waves due to a point source very close to the interface.The results provide a baseline for understanding common‐image gathers used in migration, including those associated with reverse‐time migration and full‐waveform inversion. Clarity about the space‐time form of the reflection operator will hopefully advance the goal of unifying imaging, amplitude‐versus‐offset analysis and waveform inversion. Application to the time‐domain numerical modelling of waves is also conceivable.

Go to Article


Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:17 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 





Search for:
Jump to:  


Content on EPGeology.com is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, professional judgment. EPGeology.com disclaims any and all liability for your use of its content. As most of our content is supplied by our users we can not check copyright, and stress that copyright remains at the original owner. If you suspect copyright infringement please use the contact form to report it.
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB Asteroid Mining

phpBB SEO