Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share valuable knowledge. Registration is easy so become a member now for instant free access.
  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Upstream Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology students and graduates can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.

  >> Register Now





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Full waveform inversion and distance separated... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 238
Post Full waveform inversion and distance separated...
Geophysical Prospecting: Full waveform inversion and distance separated simultaneous sweeping: a study with a land seismic data set

Dense, wide‐aperture and broad frequency band acquisition improves seismic imaging and potentially allows the use of full waveform inversion for velocity model building. The cost of dense acquisitions however limits its applicability. Blended or simultaneous shooting could lead to a good compromise between cost and dense acquisition, although the cross‐talk between simultaneous sweeps may reduce imaging capabilities. Onshore, a compromise is achieved with distance separated simultaneous sweeping acquisition, because the shots are easily separated when the processing focuses on pre‐critical reflected events. Full waveform inversion for velocity model building however relies on post‐critical reflected, refracted and diving events. These events can interfere in a distance separated simultaneous sweeping acquisition. By using a single vibrator, single receiver data set recorded in Inner Mongolia, China, a distance separated simultaneous sweeping data set is created to study the robustness of full waveform inversion in this acquisition context. This data set is well suited for full waveform inversion since it contains frequencies down to 1.5 Hz and offsets up to 25 km. Full waveform inversion after a crude deblending of the distance separated simultaneous sweeping data set leads to a result very similar to the one obtained from the single vibrator, single receiver data set. The inversion of the blended data set gives a slightly less good result because of the cross‐talk but it is still quite satisfactory.

Go to Article


Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 





Search for:
Jump to:  


Content on EPGeology.com is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, professional judgment. EPGeology.com disclaims any and all liability for your use of its content. As most of our content is supplied by our users we can not check copyright, and stress that copyright remains at the original owner. If you suspect copyright infringement please use the contact form to report it.
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB Asteroid Mining

phpBB SEO