Welcome to Petroleum Geology Forums

This is a free online community that aims to bring petroleum professionals and geologists together and share valuable knowledge. Registration is easy so become a member now for instant free access.
  • Petroleum Geologists can stay up to date with industry related topics and exchange ideas and concepts.
  • Upstream Oil and Gas Consultants get a chance to share their expertise and gain exposure to land future projects.
  • Geology students and graduates can join the discussion and get into contact with potential future employees.

  >> Register Now

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Computational elastic up‐scaling of sandstone on the... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 238
Post Computational elastic up‐scaling of sandstone on the...
Geophysical Prospecting: Computational elastic up‐scaling of sandstone on the basis of X‐ray micro‐tomographic images

Up‐scaling the elastic properties of digitized rock volumes as obtained from X‐ray computer tomography (CT) imaging via computer simulations has the potential to assist and complement laboratory measurements. This computational up‐scaling approach remains a challenging task as the overall elastic properties are not only dependent on the elastic properties of individual grains but also on the hardly resolvable pore spaces between adjacent grains such as micro‐cracks. We develop a digitized rock image and elastic up‐scaling workflow based on general‐purpose and widely available software packages. Particular attention is paid to CT image processing including filtering, smoothing and segmentation. A strategy for optimal meshing for subsequent finite‐element modelling is also proposed. We apply this workflow to the micro‐tomographic image of a well‐consolidated, feldspatic sandstone sample and determine the up‐scaled bulk and shear moduli. These effective elastic moduli are compared to the moduli inferred from laboratory ultrasound measurements at variable effective stresses (0–70 MPa). We observe that the numerically up‐scaled elastic moduli correspond to the moduli at a certain effective stress level (50 MPa), beyond which the effective‐stress dependency follows a linear trend. This indicates that the computational up‐scaling approach yields moduli as if all compliant (soft) porosity was absent, i.e., microcracks are closed. To confirm this hypothesis, we estimate the amount of soft porosity on the basis of the double‐porosity theory (Shapiro, 2003) and find that at 50 MPa the soft porosity is indeed practically zero. We conclude that our computational elastic up‐scaling approach yields physically consistent effective moduli even if some geometrical features are below CT resolution. To account for these sub‐resolution features either theoretical or additional computational approaches can be used.

Go to Article

Tue May 22, 2012 4:27 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

Search for:
Jump to:  

Content on EPGeology.com is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, professional judgment. EPGeology.com disclaims any and all liability for your use of its content. As most of our content is supplied by our users we can not check copyright, and stress that copyright remains at the original owner. If you suspect copyright infringement please use the contact form to report it.
Contact || © EPGeology.com. || Powered by phpBB Asteroid Mining